Skip to candidate scores

Penticton votes · October 17, 2026

Who can deliver?

Here’s my scorecard, a quick biography from what I was able to find on each candidate, their voting record and my take.

I want more businesses, more workers and a city where our kids can build a future. These are my assessments through that lens, with sources you can check. We’re choosing six councillors and one mayor.

The scorecards

What earns a score?

Each category is out of ten. P = provisional. Unscored means insufficient information, never zero. The order follows the video, with thinner public records first; it is not a ranking.

Three editorial scores for every candidate listed by the city on September 14, 2026
CandidateBuilder recordPenticton’s futureJudgment &
accountability
01 / Council · 19 candidates, six seats
Kevin LefebvreUnscored5/10P5/10P
Isaiah CollinsIncludes a video score update7/10P8/10P8/10P
Lainie Greyeyes5/10PUnscoredUnscored
Lee Abel5/10P5/10P5/10P
Riley Thompson5/10P8/10P5/10P
Kandy Sztepanacz6/10P6/10P6/10P
Krystal Sheridan7/10P5/10PUnscored
Davinder Sandhu7/10P6/10P4/10P
Lyle Brant7/10UnscoredUnscored
John Cowan7/106/10P6/10P
Nick Stulberg7/107/10P6/10P
Celine Lucier8/10PUnscoredUnscored
Janine Walker8/106/10P5/10P
Subrina Monteith8/106/10P6/10P
Jason Reynen8/106/106/10
Shannon Stewart8/106/105/10
Ryan Graham8/106/105/10
Isaac Gilbert7/107/107/10
Andrew Jakubeit9/107/105/10
02 / Mayor · Six candidates, one seat
Ashley MurrinUnscoredUnscoredUnscored
Beverley KohlerUnscoredUnscoredUnscored
Corey Hounslow7/10P6/10PUnscored
Jordan Iannone9/10Unscored7/10P
Dan AshtonIncludes a video score update8/10Unscored8/10P
Julius Bloomfield8/107/107/10

Scores come from the written research scorecard, with explicit changes from the recording. Where no replacement number was spoken, the written score remains. No combined totals are used. Each profile explains its evidence and limits.

01 / The council field

The team we’re choosing.

Back to all scores

Different experience can make a stronger council. I’m looking at what each person brings and which questions remain open.

Council candidate · 01

Kevin Lefebvre

#

Background & public record

Kevin’s biography describes growing up in Penticton, postsecondary education and volunteer involvement, including helping with an evacuation comfort centre. I did not find enough detail to verify a substantial career or project-management record beyond those candidate-reported descriptions. Candidate biography.

His platform is more specific about spending: an independent audit of departments and a two-year moratorium on cosmetic infrastructure additions or changes. Current platform.

A practical test is whether he can separate a low-value expense from an investment with a worthwhile return. If a streetscape project costs money but improves accessibility and a trading area, how would he evaluate it? The answer should be a method, rather than simply attaching the word cosmetic.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder recordUnscored
Penticton’s future5/10P
Judgment and accountability5/10P
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

I have candidate-reported education and volunteering, but not enough concrete career or project responsibility to assign a fair builder score. A named project with his role and outcome would help.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Spending restraint and proposed private-sector partnerships are relevant. The public agenda is stronger on scrutinizing expenditure than on a specific housing and employment program. I want to know which productive investments he would prioritize.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

On the proposal itself. An independent audit can identify useful changes, but the scope, price and decision rules matter. A two-year cosmetic-spending freeze also needs a workable definition. I cannot yet treat these proposals as demonstrated savings.

My take

Video · 07:08

I want a city that creates opportunity as well as watches spending. I’m skeptical of a blanket freeze on “cosmetic” projects: the way our city looks, accessibility and inviting public spaces matter to tourism and business. Define what you would stop, what you would invest in and what an audit would actually change.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Kevin Lefebvre

Council candidate · 02 · Penticton Together

Isaiah Collins

#

Background & public record

Isaiah has been introduced publicly as a local documentary filmmaker and high-school athletics coach. Those roles can involve initiative, communication and showing up consistently for people. Candidate introduction.

What I couldn’t establish in enough detail was a portfolio of named projects, their responsibility for them, and a sufficiently specific individual municipal plan.

Making a documentary can require finding a story, earning trust, organizing production and finishing something people can watch. Coaching can require sustained commitment. I want to see which of those responsibilities Isaiah has personally carried, with a film or program we can identify.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record7/10P
Penticton’s future8/10P
Judgment and accountability8/10P

The recording ends with 7 / 8 / 8, after earlier, different numbers. These are the closing scores, not a new independent evidence rating. No total is used; the spoken total was inconsistent.

Why these scores?

Builder record · Jordan’s closing video score

Jordan gives extra weight to bridge-building and consistent community involvement he has seen firsthand. The public research alone supported a provisional 5; more named delivery examples are still needed.

Penticton’s future · Jordan’s closing video score

Jordan’s conversations with Isaiah about housing, opportunity and a future where children can stay in Penticton inform this score. It is a personal assessment, beyond the individual platform verified in the research.

Judgment and accountability · Jordan’s closing video score

Jordan’s closing score in the recording was 8, following an earlier 7 and a request for concrete examples of difficult decisions. This remains a provisional personal assessment, with limited documented outcomes.

My take

Video · 11:48

I know Isaiah personally, and I would support having Isaiah on council. The intelligence, bridge-building and constant presence at community events stand out to me. We have talked about creating a future where our kids can stay here. I still want concrete examples of delivering projects and making hard decisions, but I think Isaiah would bring real energy and commitment.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Isaiah Collins

Council candidate · 03 · Penticton Together

Lainie Greyeyes

#

Background & public record

Lainie’s community contribution is more concrete than a generic candidate description. Okanagan College documented her work as a Knowledge Sharer in an Indigenous youth camp, including cultural teaching and making medicine pouches with participants. Okanagan College program report.

That is an example of doing work in the community. It doesn’t establish that she founded the whole program or managed its entire budget, and I’m not going to inflate it.

The youth-camp example matters because it gives us a specific contribution to discuss. Teaching and sharing knowledge are real community work. I want to hear what else she has organized or changed, and how she would translate that experience into responsibilities across the entire municipality.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record5/10P
Penticton’s futureUnscored
Judgment and accountabilityUnscored
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

There is a named program and a documented contribution, which deserves credit. The evidence does not yet establish the scope of leadership, budget responsibility or repeated project delivery needed for a higher builder score.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

I want her own housing and economic priorities, with practical steps. Cultural and community experience can inform a strong plan; it does not substitute for publishing one.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

I do not have enough documented decisions and outcomes to grade this separately. An example of solving a difficult problem within a community project would be a useful starting point.

My take

Video · 14:25

I don’t know Lainie personally. The documented youth-camp contribution deserves recognition, but I want a fuller public account of her work, housing priorities and economic plan before filling in the other scores. A research gap is something a candidate can help resolve.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Lainie Greyeyes

Council candidate · 04

Lee Abel

#

Background & public record

Lee has identifiable community involvement. Local reporting connects him with The Brine, a group organizing pickleball events around the Okanagan. His campaign emphasizes safety, accessibility, recreation, tourism and spending discipline. Community reporting; Campaign.

He also opposes removing the trust condition from the Power Street property in the referendum and advocates an indoor multisport facility. That is a concrete position to discuss. Candidate’s published argument.

His opposition to the referendum is something voters can actually evaluate. I would separate the desired outcome, preserving public benefit, from whether keeping the existing restriction is the best way to achieve it. The score should follow that argument and the alternatives, not which side of a referendum sounds more pro-growth.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record5/10P
Penticton’s future5/10P
Judgment and accountability5/10P
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Recreation involvement is documented, but the record I can assess is still limited in project scope and responsibility. This is credit for identifiable participation, without assuming he managed the whole operation or its budget.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Recreation, accessibility and visitor activity matter to quality of life and commerce. His public case is more developed on those subjects than on the housing and workforce changes that would support growth across the city.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

On the published land-use proposal. Protecting public recreation is a legitimate objective. The missing part of the proposal is the comparison of feasible alternatives, capital costs and continuing operating costs. That is why I see a limited case rather than a strong one.

My take

Video · 16:26

I like the attention to recreation, accessibility and an indoor multi-sport facility. Those things can improve daily life and our visitor economy. The next step is a practical plan: what gets built, where, when, at what capital and operating cost, and how do we get it done?

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Lee Abel

Council candidate · 05

Riley Thompson

#

Background & public record

Riley describes himself as an apprentice electrician, and council appointed him to its Public Safety Advisory Committee in February. His campaign proposes permit reporting, pre-approved small-home designs, investment initiatives and other specific changes. Biography; Platform; February 17 appointment.

There is enough there to have a substantive policy conversation.

Here is a concrete example of going deeper. He proposes monthly permit-performance reporting and pre-approved infill designs. That is specific enough to judge and eventually measure. But the financial section still cites 6.26 percent for 2026; the City announced 5.93 percent after deliberations. This is a correction to a campaign figure, not a claim about his intent or every household’s bill. Platform; City budget announcement.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record5/10P
Penticton’s future8/10P
Judgment and accountability5/10P
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Trade training, committee participation and a developed platform establish relevant activity and initiative. They do not yet establish a long record of leading and completing substantial projects. Age itself adds or removes no points.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

The published plan is unusually specific about permit processes, industrial opportunity and downtown activity. It fits the direction I want to examine. Proposed funding and benefits still need verification, so specificity earns attention rather than a guarantee that the plan works.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

A budget argument needs accurate inputs. His platform uses the draft 2026 municipal tax increase of 6.26 percent, while the City’s subsequent announcement revised it to 5.93 percent. I would want that corrected and the financial case checked. Updating it openly would be a positive accountability signal.

My take

Video · 19:52

I really like the permitting ideas, particularly pre-approved infill designs and monthly public reporting. A visible scoreboard makes it easier to hold the city accountable, and speed matters for getting homes built. I want accurate budget inputs and a clear explanation of how these proposals would move through council.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Riley Thompson

Council candidate · 06

Kandy Sztepanacz

#

Background & public record

Kandy, also identified as Kandace in her filing, lists online-course and digital-product businesses alongside health-sector employment. That establishes some business activity, although it doesn’t tell us its size or results. Official nomination.

There is also a clear public initiative: she started the parliamentary petition for an alternative road connection toward Kelowna through the Naramata area. It received 1,737 validated signatures and a government response. That is documented advocacy; it isn’t a funded or approved road. House of Commons petition e-7035.

The petition moved beyond being posted online: it was presented in Parliament and received a government response. The response still leaves the road question with the relevant governments and project process. That distinction is where an advocate can show practical judgment about the next step. Parliamentary record.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record6/10P
Penticton’s future6/10P
Judgment and accountability6/10P
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

The digital-business declarations and documented petition establish initiative. The evidence is less clear about the scale of the businesses or delivery of a complex project, so I keep the score in the limited-evidence band.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Transport resilience has a real connection to workers and businesses. The public case I can assess is concentrated on that issue. I need a wider municipal housing and employment agenda.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

Taking a petition through the parliamentary process is a concrete example of follow-through. The hard part now is feasibility, jurisdiction and funding. Signatures and a government response should not be presented as approval for construction.

My take

Video · 22:04

I haven’t met Kandy. I like that the road proposal went beyond an online post and through a formal petition process. Transport resilience matters to businesses and workers, especially when our main route is disrupted. Now I want to see the feasibility, partners and funding needed to deliver it.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Kandy Sztepanacz

Council candidate · 07

Krystal Sheridan

#

Background & public record

Krystal identifies as a lifelong local and small-business owner. Her nomination names Krystal Breeze Esthetics, and the business has an identifiable service and booking presence. Official nomination; Business; Campaign.

That’s an actual business, not a vague entrepreneurial label.

A local service business can provide a close view of customer demand and household budgets. That is relevant. The council question is how she would respond when a decision helps future residents or workers but creates opposition among people who already live nearby.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record7/10P
Penticton’s future5/10P
Judgment and accountabilityUnscored
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

There is an identifiable operating esthetics business, which earns meaningful credit. I do not have sufficiently detailed evidence of its scale, growth or her wider project record to justify a higher score.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

The campaign themes of safety, tax care and careful growth are relevant but broad. I need the actual housing and business choices behind those words to assess a stronger plan.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

I want a documented difficult decision, what it cost and what she learned. Running a business provides opportunities to develop judgment, but I am not going to invent a performance history from the business listing.

My take

Video · 24:24

Starting and operating a real business is hard, and that earns credit with me. I want more detail on Krystal’s plans and difficult decisions. On taxes, my question goes beyond what we can cut: how do we build a stronger local economy and a healthier revenue base?

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Krystal Sheridan

Council candidate · 08

Davinder Sandhu

#

Background & public record

Davinder’s current nomination disclosure lists him as owner of SSF Security Limited and a program coordinator at PDSCL. That provides a more concrete basis for discussing his experience. Official nomination.

In his 2022 candidate questionnaire, he supported more affordable housing and discussed seniors’ needs and public safety. He also proposed AI-based facial recognition as part of crime prevention. Those are older statements, not a verified current platform. 2022 questionnaire.

This is a useful test of what forward-thinking actually means. Some applications of AI may save time with modest risk. A system that identifies people for police attention raises a different set of questions. I want him to show that he distinguishes those applications and knows who is responsible when a system makes a mistake.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record7/10P
Penticton’s future6/10P
Judgment and accountability4/10P
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

The declared security business and program-coordination work establish relevant responsibilities. I would need clearer evidence of team size, projects and results to move the builder score higher.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Using the dated platform. Affordable housing, seniors and public safety are relevant to a functioning city. I need an updated 2026 plan before treating those 2022 answers as current commitments.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

On the limited proposal evidence. The facial-recognition idea as presented did not establish the safeguards and accountability I would require. I am grading that published proposal, not alleging wrongdoing or claiming he has implemented it. An updated position could materially change this score.

My take

Video · 26:30

The business and program-coordination responsibilities are relevant. I want to understand the scale of the work and the hard decisions involved. I’m enthusiastic about AI, but facial recognition for crime prevention raises serious questions for me. That was a 2022 proposal; I want to know whether he still supports it and what safeguards he would require.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Davinder Sandhu

Council candidate · 09

Lyle Brant

#

Background & public record

Lyle has a more concrete operating background than an empty campaign page might suggest. Brant’s Irrigation Maintenance identifies him as its owner and operator, with decades of industry experience serving residential and commercial customers. Business website.

That is work involving customers, scheduling, maintenance and solving physical problems.

This could be useful experience at a council table because infrastructure decisions are often about maintenance, replacement and getting work done reliably. That is my inference about the relevance of the work, not a claim that his private business proves how he would vote on a City contract.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record7/10
Penticton’s futureUnscored
Judgment and accountabilityUnscored
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

A longstanding owner-operated irrigation business provides a clear operating record in an essential local service. It supports a strong experience score. The evidence does not establish larger team leadership or measured growth, so I stop short of the top band.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

I do not have a sufficiently detailed current platform. I want his proposed changes for business operations, housing, infrastructure and the worker shortage.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

A functioning business is relevant, but I need a specific decision and outcome to assess judgment separately from experience. How did he balance a short-term saving against a long-term maintenance problem?

My take

Video · 29:12

I like the owner-operator background. Solving physical problems for customers could be useful when council faces infrastructure decisions. I want him to connect that experience to specific changes for housing, business operations and the worker shortage. The experience is a starting point; residents still need to know what their vote would deliver.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Lyle Brant

Council candidate · 10

John Cowan

#

Background & public record

John is a retired Canadian Pacific train conductor who has kept pushing for better long-distance bus connections. Reporting documents a petition with more than 1,500 supporters, presentations and discussions involving Ebus. Transit advocacy reporting.

That is tangible persistence on an issue connected to workers, visitors and residents who don’t drive.

It is not evidence that a new bus service has been delivered. We need to distinguish advocacy from an operating route.

There is a concrete result beyond collecting signatures. The City’s April 21 summary says his presentation led council to direct discussions involving the City and regional district CAOs and to provide a support letter for Ebus service. That is institutional progress, even though it is not a bus arriving at a stop. City council highlights.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record7/10
Penticton’s future6/10P
Judgment and accountability6/10P

Jordan praised John’s follow-through in the recording without giving a replacement judgment number. The provisional 6 from the written scorecard is retained.

Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

The railway background is relevant, and his advocacy produced a documented council response. That is a stronger example of taking initiative and moving an institution than a petition alone. It still falls short of an operating service.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Better connections can help workers, visitors and people who do not drive. His public case is clearest on transport. I need an equally usable position on housing and the other constraints on local employers.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

Taking the proposal to decision-makers and obtaining support is a useful example of follow-through. The commercial viability and service outcome remain unresolved. A credible next step is an operator-backed proposal, not a promise that council can simply order the route into existence.

My take

Video · 30:20

I have had coffee with John and encouraged him to run. His persistence stands out: he keeps bringing the transport issue to decision-makers and does not give up easily. I think he could be a strong councillor because of that energy and follow-through. I would also like a wider view of future mobility and economic opportunity beyond the bus connection.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for John Cowan

Council candidate · 11 · Penticton Together

Nick Stulberg

#

Background & public record

Nick has payroll and accounting experience at OneSky. He also founded the Penticton Neighbourhood Association and has served on housing and sustainability bodies. That gives us both technical work and an example of building a community organization. Association’s founding account; 2025 candidate profile.

His published positions include using city land to support affordable housing.

His association held its inaugural annual general meeting in 2023. That matters because it is a specific organization with a public beginning, rather than an undefined claim of community involvement. It still leaves us to examine what the organization accomplished and what part he personally delivered. Association account.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record7/10
Penticton’s future7/10P
Judgment and accountability6/10P
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Founding a neighbourhood association is an identifiable act of institution-building, alongside relevant payroll and financial work. I am not calling him a chartered accountant or assuming credentials beyond the published record.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Using public land for affordable housing gives us a concrete direction that fits worker retention. The next level is a named site, partner, housing model and financial case, connected to an employment strategy.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

Creating an association and participating in housing work show follow-through. I do not have an elected voting record or a completed housing project attributable to him. His next test is turning an advocated model into a viable proposal with transparent tradeoffs.

My take

Video · 33:50

I like the proposal to use city land for housing. That is a concrete direction that could help people live and work here. Now I want the details: which land, which partner, what public contribution and what completion date? Housing and the work of attracting employers and employees need to be considered together.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Nick Stulberg

Council candidate · 12

Celine Lucier

#

Background & public record

Celine’s experience deserves a serious look. Her nomination disclosure lists Director of Leadership Development roles associated with Earls Kitchen and Bar, Salty’s Beach House and Local Public Eatery. Local also lists her in its Penticton leadership, and the Chamber identifies her business involvement. Official nomination; Local Public Eatery; Chamber team.

That suggests useful experience developing people in a sector where staffing and retention matter. It does not mean she owns those restaurants, and I’m not claiming that.

What catches my attention is the leadership-development part. Helping other people become capable can matter as much as personally being the strongest operator. That is the potential relevance to a council trying to attract and retain workers. The next step is documenting what she changed and how the organization measured it.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record8/10P
Penticton’s futureUnscored
Judgment and accountabilityUnscored
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

The disclosed leadership-development responsibilities across three hospitality brands support a strong score for relevant operating experience. It remains provisional because team size, employment outcomes and her specific completed initiatives are not independently established here.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

The experience could inform a useful workforce strategy, but I need her own proposals. I am not awarding a future score based on what I imagine someone in hospitality would believe.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

I want one actual example of a hard operating choice and its result. How did she improve retention, develop a manager or fix a process? The role title supports experience; it does not, by itself, establish the quality of those decisions.

My take

Video · 36:08

Hospitality leadership is hard. I have owned a restaurant, and I know how demanding staffing and operations can be. That experience earns real credit. I want Celine to turn it into a specific workforce strategy connecting housing, transportation, training and year-round business viability.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Celine Lucier

Council candidate · 13

Janine Walker

#

Background & public record

Janine’s 2025 profile describes more than two decades in downtown business with her husband, including Canadian Handmade, and 12 years in community-support work involving mental-health housing. That is a useful combination of operating and frontline experience. 2025 profile.

Her published positions included an independent spending audit, scrutiny of infrastructure costs and better accessibility. Those are earlier campaign statements that need a current update.

The two parts of her background could make for a useful conversation about downtown. Businesses need a place where customers want to spend time. People facing housing and mental-health problems need an effective response. I want her to explain a decision that improved both, or how she handled the tradeoff when that was not possible.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record8/10
Penticton’s future6/10P
Judgment and accountability5/10P
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Longstanding downtown business and community-support work create a substantial combination of operating and frontline experience. That should give her useful perspectives on the same downtown problems from more than one direction.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Based on the earlier platform. Accessibility, functioning infrastructure and spending scrutiny matter. I need the 2026 update to explain how she would also expand housing and economic opportunity.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

On the published proposals. An audit and scrutiny of costs are reasonable starting points, but I need the method, expense and decisions that follow. A call for scrutiny is not yet a demonstrated saving or a delivered solution.

My take

Video · 37:45

The combination of downtown business and frontline community work is useful. I want an updated platform and a broader conversation about building opportunity. An audit may be a tool, but I’m not convinced spending scrutiny should be the main answer to what Penticton needs next.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Janine Walker

Council candidate · 14

Subrina Monteith

#

Background & public record

Subrina has served as the regional district’s Area I director since 2018. Her RDOS biography describes an events business and years helping organize the BC pool championships, along with community volunteering. RDOS biography.

Those are relevant experiences: getting people to attend something, managing logistics and making public decisions.

There’s also a consequential growth decision to examine. In 2021, reporting documented her motion to halt the Twin Lakes Golf Resort rezoning process, citing water, density and rural-character concerns. The board rejected that motion and continued the process. Contemporaneous reporting.

Her RDOS biography describes coordinating the BC 8- and 9-ball championships with her husband over many years, alongside community roles including Peachfest. That is repeat event work, not just a one-time appearance. It offers a concrete basis for asking about budgets, logistics and managing relationships. RDOS biography.

Voting record

Regional record: the 2021 Twin Lakes example concerns her motion to halt the rezoning process, which the RDOS board rejected. It is not a Penticton council vote.

Builder record8/10
Penticton’s future6/10P
Judgment and accountability6/10P
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Running events and serving in regional government gives her experience with logistics, partnerships and public responsibility. The combination is stronger than either a business label or a board title on its own.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Tourism and regional experience are relevant, but I need a clearer position on where Penticton should add homes and employment space. The Twin Lakes issue shows a real growth tradeoff; it does not establish that she would oppose urban housing.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

On the limited decision sample. Raising water constraints can be sound risk management. Seeking to stop a proposal rather than resolve conditions needs an explanation of what evidence would change the answer. I would want more regional decisions before treating this as a broad record score.

My take

Video · 40:47

I give credit for sustained event work and public responsibility. I’m looking for leaders who can turn concerns into workable conditions and help things get built. On growth, I want to know what evidence would resolve her concerns and where she would actively support more homes. Rural water constraints and urban infill are different questions.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Subrina Monteith

Council candidate · 15

Jason Reynen

#

Background & public record

Jason’s City biography identifies him as a mechanic-shop owner, former CrossFit gym owner and someone with a decade of oilfield experience. He joined council in 2025. City biography.

That is a real operating background. In August, he also brought a motion seeking the approval history, traffic information and costs associated with the Skaha and Green road changes, including the implications of reversal. That kind of request can support a better decision. August 18 minutes, motion 226/2026.

The road motion is worth separating from a promise to rip something out. The approved request sought the information needed to evaluate the choices, including the cost of reversing course. That is the useful behaviour I want from a person with an operating background.

Voting record

Current council: individual votes appear in the selected vote record below. Only decisions during the candidate’s time in office are attributed.

See the individual votes
Builder record8/10
Penticton’s future6/10
Judgment and accountability6/10
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

The mechanic shop, former gym and field-industry experience provide a broad operating base. I want that background to show up in cost comparisons and practical implementation, not just in his campaign biography.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Workforce housing and trying a mobility pilot earn points. His preferred alternative to the rejected tiny homes still needs to become a funded, deliverable proposal before the broader city-functioning case earns a stronger score.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

Requesting the road project history, data and reversal costs is a positive example of evidence-seeking. The tiny-homes rejection holds the score back under my available-option-versus-credible-replacement test. Both decisions belong on the card.

My take

Video · 43:02

The operating background is relevant, and asking for road-project history, traffic data and reversal costs is a positive example of doing the homework. I disagree with rejecting the tiny-homes option without a credible funded replacement in the evidence reviewed. I also care about personal follow-through: in the video, I described a scheduled coffee meeting that he did not attend.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Jason Reynen

Council candidate · 16

Shannon Stewart

#

Background & public record

Shannon brings substantial service experience. Her 2025 profile describes 17 years in the school district, developing a youth mental-health program at the Ooknakane Friendship Centre, and a private counselling practice. She also helped start Clean Streets Penticton. 2025 profile.

That is building services and working with people facing real problems. She joined council in 2025.

The distinction in her background is between observing a social problem and developing a response to it. Her reported youth-program work is relevant to the second. That makes my question more specific: which design problems can be fixed inside a proposal, and which genuinely justify refusing it?

Voting record

Current council: individual votes appear in the selected vote record below. Only decisions during the candidate’s time in office are attributed.

See the individual votes
Builder record8/10
Penticton’s future6/10
Judgment and accountability5/10
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

School-sector work, developing a youth program, a counselling practice and community organizing give her substantial experience beyond elected office. Building a service that people use counts under this framework.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Workforce-housing support earns credit. The tiny-homes and micromobility decisions make the record more cautious and mixed under my priorities. The AI information vote means I would not describe her as uniformly opposed to new approaches.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

Rejecting the tiny-homes option holds the score back. Supporting the later amended shelter permit earns credit for responding to a changed proposal. I want to see the outcomes and the evidence that would make her revise a position again.

My take

Video · 45:16

I give credit for substantial service and community experience. Her housing and micromobility decisions look more cautious than I want. My question is when a concern leads you to improve a proposal and when it leads you to stop it. In the video, I also said our planned coffee meetings had not taken place; that is my personal experience, separate from the recorded votes.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Shannon Stewart

Council candidate · 17

Ryan Graham

#

Background & public record

Ryan has real operating experience. Reporting identifies him as a managing partner at Bluewater Cannabis, and his public record includes downtown-business leadership. Working in a regulated business is relevant experience for someone making rules that affect other businesses. Business profile; City biography.

The Bluewater profile names him as a managing partner in a business opening in a heavily regulated industry. That is a useful starting point for a conversation about permissions, compliance and predictability. I want him to identify which lessons actually influenced his City decisions. Business profile.

Voting record

Current council: individual votes appear in the selected vote record below. Only decisions during the candidate’s time in office are attributed.

See the individual votes
Builder record8/10
Penticton’s future6/10
Judgment and accountability5/10
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

The regulated-business background and downtown-business leadership are a strong combination of operating and community responsibility. That establishes relevant experience, without treating the existence of a business as proof of its financial performance.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

His workforce-housing and mobility votes earn credit. The tiny-homes decision makes the broader approach to a functioning city more mixed under my priorities. I also need specific examples of barriers removed for employers.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

On this selected record. The tiny-homes rejection carries substantial weight because I could not establish a comparably ready, funded replacement in the evidence reviewed. His other housing votes keep this from becoming a simplistic claim that he opposes building. A concrete alternative and results could change the assessment.

My take

Video · 46:45

Operating in a regulated industry is useful experience, but it does not settle the question of judgment. The tiny-homes rejection weighs heavily for me. If that model was unacceptable, what funded replacement did we deliver? I also want specific examples of barriers removed for employers so local businesses can thrive and hire.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Ryan Graham

Council candidate · 18 · Penticton Together

Isaac Gilbert

#

Background & public record

Isaac’s background includes arboriculture and work as a BC parks ranger. Before council, he chaired Penticton’s parks and recreation advisory committee. His City biography also describes theatre and cooperative involvement. City biography.

That combines field work, public responsibility and community participation. It would be lazy to dismiss it because some of the work was in the public sector.

His support for the tiny homes and workforce-housing decisions fits my housing priorities. He also supported the shared micromobility pilot. January 20 minutes.

The park-ranger background includes work in Manning Park and the South Okanagan before his election to council. That brings experience with land, public use and practical enforcement. I would want to hear how he balances those considerations when a housing or recreation proposal presents a real tradeoff. City biography.

Voting record

Current council: individual votes appear in the selected vote record below. Only decisions during the candidate’s time in office are attributed.

See the individual votes
Builder record7/10
Penticton’s future7/10
Judgment and accountability7/10
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Field work, advisory leadership and community activity form a substantial experience base. I am not counting a committee chair as the person who personally delivered every park project. Clearer examples of projects he initiated and completed would strengthen the record.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

The selected housing and mobility votes support a city where more people can live and get around. For a higher score, I want an equally concrete approach to employers, productivity and workers being able to build careers here.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

On the selected votes. His housing decisions fit my preference for moving a workable option forward. Supporting a pilot also allows learning. The unanswered part is whether he would stop or redesign an initiative when its measured performance disappointed.

My take

Video · 49:00

I have had coffee with Isaac and would support having him on council again. He listens and seems willing to consider the future. His housing votes and willingness to try a pilot fit my priorities. I still want an equally concrete plan for employers, productivity and careers that let workers and families stay here.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Isaac Gilbert

Council candidate · 19

Andrew Jakubeit

#

Background & public record

Andrew has operated the Grooveyard for decades and has a video-production business. He has also served as a councillor and mayor, with substantial downtown and community involvement. His current platform discusses housing options, energy costs and economic development. Current campaign and biography.

That is a strong builder résumé.

But his mayoral record includes the Trio Skaha project. The City’s own 2017 release says it terminated the agreement, paid $200,000, and explained that the project had materially changed. That is a documented public cost and a project-governance question from his administration. It is not evidence that he alone made every decision. City termination announcement.

There is also an identifiable creative project: Peachfest’s 2026 page names him as organizer of the Reel Peach Film Festival. His current platform specifically proposes lower development costs for secondary suites and carriage houses and a larger health-services sector. Those are more useful details than a generic promise to support business. Peachfest; Current platform.

Voting record

Earlier municipal record: the Trio Skaha termination occurred during his mayoral term. The city release documents the outcome and $200,000 payment; this page does not assign an unverified individual roll-call vote.

Builder record9/10
Penticton’s future7/10
Judgment and accountability5/10
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Long-running retail and production businesses, public office and identifiable community projects create one of the deeper builder records in this field. This score rewards the breadth and continuity of the work, not every decision made during it.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

The current platform connects housing on existing lots, the north gateway, energy and a stronger health-services economy. Those fit the prosperity lens. The cost, authority and sequencing of the proposals need more detail before I put the plan in the top band.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

The Trio project creates a substantial governance concern in the record I reviewed. I give credit for ending an agreement that no longer made sense, but that does not remove the cost or the need to explain the earlier process. This is a mixed judgment score, not an allegation of personal misconduct.

My take

Video · 51:00

I like the depth of the business record and the attention to energy. I want economic development that brings new businesses and younger families alongside a strong health-services sector. On Trio Skaha, experiments can carry costs, but residents deserve an explanation of the process and what would be structurally different next time.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Andrew Jakubeit

02 / The mayoral race

Who leads the table?

Back to all scores

The same three categories apply. Mayoral candidates also need to explain how they would set direction and help six councillors reach decisions.

Mayor candidate · 01

Ashley Murrin

#

Background & public record

Ashley is on the official nomination list. I could not verify enough public information about professional experience, community projects or a substantive platform to give a responsible assessment beyond that. City candidate list.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder recordUnscored
Penticton’s futureUnscored
Judgment and accountabilityUnscored
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

I could not verify a sufficient public record of work or community projects to grade. A clear account of what she has done and her responsibility in it would allow a meaningful assessment.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

I need a substantive mayoral agenda with priorities within the City’s control and clear partners for the things outside it.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

I need documented examples of decisions, follow-through and learning. Filling these boxes with arbitrary low numbers would make the graphic look complete while making the information worse.

My take

Video · 57:01

I could not find enough information to offer a fair assessment. I want a clear biography, evidence of work delivered and a substantive mayoral platform. Unscored means I need more information; it does not mean Ashley has no ability or experience.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Ashley Murrin

Mayor candidate · 02

Beverley Kohler

#

Background & public record

Beverley’s public nomination disclosure identifies hospitality employment as a server at Rise and Shine Cafe. That is frontline experience of a local business and its customers. Official nomination.

I could not establish a sufficiently detailed public record of projects led, larger responsibilities or a current mayoral platform to assess those fairly.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder recordUnscored
Penticton’s futureUnscored
Judgment and accountabilityUnscored
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Hospitality work is relevant experience, but it does not give me enough information about projects she has led or built. I need examples of responsibility, implementation and outcomes before assigning a number.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

I need her specific view of the housing, employment and service changes Penticton should make. A list of intentions would start the conversation; an actionable first-year plan would make the category scoreable.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

I need an example of a difficult choice, the tradeoff she faced and what happened afterward. The absence of a published leadership record is not proof that she lacks the ability.

My take

Video · 58:20

Frontline hospitality work gives someone direct experience with a local business and its customers. I still need more public information about projects led, priorities and decision-making before assessing Beverley’s readiness for mayor.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Beverley Kohler

Mayor candidate · 03

Corey Hounslow

#

Background & public record

Corey has identified himself publicly as the owner of Valley Ink Penticton. In his 2022 mayoral interview, he connected the worker shortage with housing and argued for more homes despite neighbourhood resistance. Those are relevant instincts for someone running a local business. 2022 candidate interview.

Those are also 2022 statements. I’m not going to silently turn them into a detailed 2026 platform.

The interesting part of his earlier interview was the connection between neighbourhood opposition and the shortage of places for workers to live. That gives us an actual policy choice to revisit. Would he still support the additional homes when the opposition is in the room?

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record7/10P
Penticton’s future6/10P
Judgment and accountabilityUnscored
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

For an identifiable local business and responsibility for its operation. The business connection is established; its scale, employment record and operating results are not sufficiently documented here to justify an eight or nine.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

On the older published positions. Connecting housing supply to employers being able to hire is a useful starting point. I need him to update those 2022 answers with current priorities, costs and a sequence of decisions.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

I have positions to discuss but not enough documented examples of difficult decisions and their results. I would want one business decision he got wrong, how he corrected it, and how he would work with people who oppose him.

My take

Video · 58:50

I like the connection between housing and the ability of businesses to hire. I want to hear how those 2022 positions translate into a current platform, including standing behind more homes when neighbours oppose them. What would he prioritize in the first budget, and how would he work with six councillors?

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Corey Hounslow

Mayor candidate · 04

Jordan Iannone

#

Background & public record

Now we reach one of the more substantial business-building stories in the mayoral field.

Jordan Iannone founded Hardrock Diamond Drilling. The Canadian Diamond Drilling Association describes a career that began as a drill helper in 1988, work in different parts of the world, and starting the company in 2004 with one drill. Its profile also documents his emphasis on mentorship and training. The business has a Penticton headquarters and a Whitehorse location. Industry profile; Hardrock.

That is a substantive answer to “what have you built?” It involves equipment, people, field operations and risk. His nomination disclosure confirms the business connection. Official nomination.

I do not have independently verified job-creation, revenue or profitability figures, so none of those are part of this score.

Voting record

No elected Penticton council voting record was established in the research reviewed. Campaign positions, committee participation and advocacy are not council votes.

Builder record9/10
Penticton’s futureUnscored
Judgment and accountability7/10P
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Starting with one drill and developing an operating company is a stronger builder case than simply listing an executive title. The industry profile documents progression from field work to company leadership, plus mentoring. That earns the exceptional band for this category.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

I have not verified a detailed current municipal platform. A strong business record does not tell me his position on housing density, worker attraction, permitting or how AI could change the local economy. I want his actual answers.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

On the operating evidence. Growing the company and emphasizing training show a basis for assessing delivery and people development. This is not a tested municipal record. Public procurement, disagreement and decisions affecting people who cannot choose another provider are different responsibilities.

My take

Video · 1:00:25

Starting with one drill and growing an operating company across locations is a substantial builder story. I value the people development and risk involved. But leading a company and leading a council are different jobs. I want his housing priorities, approach to public finances, availability and view of how AI changes the city.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Jordan Iannone

Mayor candidate · 05

Dan Ashton

#

Background & public record

Next is a candidate bringing a much longer public-service record.

Dan brings a long record: council from 1999, mayor from 2008 to 2013, then MLA until 2024. Before that, his background included his family’s apparel business. His published biography also describes auxiliary RCMP service and community-board involvement. That is business exposure and substantial public responsibility. Published biography; 2026 candidacy announcement.

The hospital expansion is an example of major investment during his provincial tenure. But it was a provincial, regional and foundation effort. One politician doesn’t get to claim the whole thing. Province’s hospital business-plan announcement.

His path also matters: after leaving provincial office, he sought the federal Conservative nomination in 2025 and is now seeking the mayoralty. That is a continuing political career, a relevant fact for my preference for experience outside politics. It does not establish his motive for running. 2026 candidacy reporting.

Voting record

Earlier council, mayoral and provincial service is documented. A comprehensive individual vote audit for those terms has not been completed here; no votes from the current council are attributed to him.

Builder record8/10
Penticton’s futureUnscored
Judgment and accountability8/10P

Judgment was unscored in the research draft. Jordan assigned 8 in the recording; it is marked provisional because a broader consequential-decision audit remains incomplete.

Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

The family-business background and long record of carrying municipal and provincial responsibility put him in the strong-experience band. I am crediting responsibility and relevant experience, not claiming he personally built every project announced while he was in office.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

Unscored for now. I need a sufficiently detailed current housing, employment and adaptation agenda. Having held office tells us what experience he brings; it does not tell us what he would do with the next four years.

Judgment and accountability · Jordan’s video score

Jordan assigned 8 in the recording for Ashton’s experience carrying significant public responsibilities. The research draft left this category unscored pending a broader decision audit. Treat this as Jordan’s personal assessment, not that missing audit.

My take

Video · 1:02:10

I give Dan credit for the responsibilities he has carried and the things he has helped bring forward. In the recording, I gave judgment and accountability an eight. I still want a current municipal agenda and an answer to what he would do differently now. Experience should make you more effective; an old playbook should remain open to challenge.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Dan Ashton

Mayor candidate · 06

Julius Bloomfield

#

Background & public record

Julius has a broader operating background than the politician label suggests. His City biography lists construction and business management, hospitality ownership and management, and more than three decades in real estate. He has downtown-business and urban-agriculture involvement too. City biography.

That earns real credit. So do his supportive housing votes in the selected decisions in the vote table.

But the incumbent has a different burden. You’ve had the office. We should be able to discuss results, not just intentions.

The progression is real too: councillor from 2018, mayor from 2022. He has worked both as one member of council and as its chair. The useful comparison now is between the experience he brought in and the results residents can point to coming out. City biography.

Voting record

Current council: individual votes appear in the selected vote record below. Only decisions during the candidate’s time in office are attributed.

See the individual votes
Builder record8/10
Penticton’s future7/10
Judgment and accountability7/10
Why these scores?

Builder record · Research scorecard

Construction, hospitality, real estate and community leadership make this a broad operating résumé. Eight reflects that breadth. I would need clearer evidence of his personal role in completed, measurable outcomes to move it into the exceptional band.

Penticton’s future · Research scorecard

The housing votes and willingness to consider a new transport pilot fit a city making room for workers. Seven rewards those decisions. The case for a stronger local employment pipeline and practical business adoption of technology still needs to become more specific.

Judgment and accountability · Research scorecard

In this selected record, he supported an available transitional-housing option and the later shelter extension. That earns credit under my framework. The budget vote also makes him accountable for spending, and approval of a project is not proof of successful delivery.

My take

Video · 1:04:05

Julius and I have met for coffee several times. I think he listens well and is receptive to bigger ideas and advice. I give him credit for difficult housing votes and his broad operating background. My challenge is to turn that openness into results and be decisive when a hard choice is needed. I have also presented my Commons proposal to him and city staff; see my disclosure below.

Jordan’s opinion, paraphrased from the September 14 recording. Personal interactions are Jordan’s account.
Sources for Julius Bloomfield

The decisions behind the scores

How they voted.

Back to all scores

These are selected recorded decisions for the five current officeholders running again. This is a sample, not a complete term or career audit. “Yes” and “No” refer to the particular motion and stage shown, not a judgment about the person.

Open the dated minutes in each row to check the motion and full council record. Other council members are outside this candidate comparison.

Selected votes from December 2025 through August 2026
Decision & sourceJulius BloomfieldIsaac GilbertRyan GrahamJason ReynenShannon Stewart
Dec. 2, 2025 · Minutes ↗50 tiny homes: temporary-use permit

Permit motion defeated 4–2 among the six members present. The five candidates shown here are only part of that council.

YesYesNoNoNo
Dec. 16, 2025 · Minutes ↗Adopt the 2026 financial plan

All five supported adoption. Budget accountability is shared by those who voted for it.

YesYesYesYesYes
Jan. 20, 2026 · Minutes ↗Two-year shared micromobility pilot

Support for a trial, not proof of its eventual results.

YesYesYesYesNo
Jan. 20, 2026 · Minutes ↗995 Eckhardt: workforce-housing zoning readings

Zoning steps for the proposed 60-unit BC Builds project. Approval is not completed housing.

YesYesYesYesYes
Jan. 20, 2026 · Minutes ↗Initial Dawson shelter-extension direction

An earlier direction. Read this alongside the amended permit supported in February.

YesYesYesYesNo
Feb. 17, 2026 · Minutes ↗Amended Dawson shelter permit

All five, including Stewart, supported the amended three-year permit.

YesYesYesYesYes
Feb. 17, 2026 · Minutes ↗995 Eckhardt: zoning adoption

Final zoning adoption, distinct from the January readings and from construction.

YesYesYesYesYes
Aug. 18, 2026 · Minutes ↗Road-project history, traffic data and reversal costs

Reynen’s information motion, 226/2026. It did not approve reversing the Skaha and Green road changes.

YesYesYesYesYes
Aug. 18, 2026 · Minutes ↗Request more information on AI traffic technology

Motion 228/2026 requested information. It did not deploy a system or establish anyone’s AI expertise.

YesYesYesYesYes

Why tiny homes matters to my scores

My test is whether rejecting an available option comes with a credible, funded replacement. That is why the December decision weighs on my judgment scores. Opponents raised concerns about the housing model, recovery and support services. Those are legitimate questions; the proposal was not guaranteed to succeed.

The province subsequently moved on from that funding opportunity. A funded alternative or outcome not located in this research could change my assessment. Read the reporting.

Read the rest of the record too

All five supported the workforce-housing zoning steps, the amended Dawson shelter permit, the 2026 financial plan and the AI traffic information request. Stewart’s February shelter vote differs from her earlier January vote.

Approving zoning, asking for information and funding construction are different decisions. These scores give credit for the step actually taken, while still asking what was delivered and at what cost.

My priorities. Evidence you can check.

What the numbers mean.

I want leaders who have built something, understand the changes ahead and can make difficult decisions. That includes businesses, teams, community programs and useful public projects. Public-sector work can count. Wealth, age, a title or a claim to understand AI does not establish a score.

01

Builder record

What have you made happen? I look for clear responsibility, sustained operations, people development and attributable outcomes.

02

Penticton’s future

Does the plan create opportunity? Homes, employers, workers, reliable services and practical adaptation to a changing economy.

03

Judgment & accountability

How do you handle opposition, costs and setbacks? I look for trade-offs, follow-through, accurate inputs and learning from results.

3–4
Material concerns dominate the limited case reviewed.
5–6
A limited, mixed or partly developed case.
7–8
Strong relevant experience, proposals or decisions, with limits.
9–10
An exceptional demonstrated case in that category.
P
Provisional: limited, self-reported, dated or non-municipal evidence, or a personal assessment needing more documentation.
Unscored
Not enough information to grade fairly. It does not mean zero.

The facts and the scores are different things. Sources support the biographies and recorded votes. Scores are editorial judgments through my priorities, not scientific measurements, predictions, or a ranking of someone’s integrity. A one-point difference should not be treated as precise. Greater public visibility makes someone easier to assess, not automatically better qualified.

The page follows the September 14 research and recording. Older platforms are identified as such. Isaiah Collins’ closing video scores and Dan Ashton’s spoken accountability score supersede the draft as explained in their profiles. Where the video did not state a replacement number, the draft number remains. Informal transcript totals are not used.

Isaiah Collins, Isaac Gilbert, Lainie Greyeyes and Nick Stulberg are listed with Penticton Together. Group membership does not establish an individual platform or guarantee a future vote.

My perspective & disclosure

I’m a local entrepreneur and parent sharing my view of what Penticton needs. I expect AI to change work quickly, and I want the city to learn and adapt. That is my outlook, not a forecast of a particular local outcome.

I have discussed ideas with candidates and city staff, including Penticton Commons. My proposal includes a $100,000 city-funded feasibility phase that I could lead in a paid role. It is a proposal, not an approved project or awarded contract. That amount is the phase budget, not a statement of my compensation. Agreement with the proposal does not itself earn points.

Have something I missed?

I want this to be useful. If you are a candidate or have a correction, share the source, the decision or project, your role and what happened. More evidence can change a score. You can reach me through the contact section or join the discussion on Penticton with Jordan West on YouTube.

This guide covers mayor and council. For the official candidate list, school trustee race, referendum and voting arrangements, visit the City’s election page.